From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix e1000 can_receive handler Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 20:21:04 +0300 Message-ID: <48233680.50401@qumranet.com> References: <1210196458-17069-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <20080508132646.GA27727@volta.aurel32.net> <4823081D.5010108@us.ibm.com> <4823323A.8040809@qumranet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Aurelien Jarno To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4823323A.8040809@qumranet.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Avi Kivity wrote: > > Note that flow control still makes sense since it allows us to buffer > some packets if the guest is scheduled out. But we can't use it as > the primary mechanism since it won't exist with multiqueue NICs (where > the virtio descriptors are fed to driver). > ... are fed to the hardware, I meant. And to clarify further, I do think the patch is correct, but that virtio should be able to work well without it under ordinary circumstances. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone