[PATCH] qemu-kvm: Consolidate kvm_eat_signals

[Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>]

Having both kvm_eat_signal and kvm_eat_signals makes the code harder to
read. Moreover, given the single caller of kvm_eat_signals, there is no
real reason to keep it in a separate function.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
---
 qemu/qemu-kvm.c |   11 ++++-------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Index: b/qemu/qemu-kvm.c
===================================================================
--- a/qemu/qemu-kvm.c
+++ b/qemu/qemu-kvm.c
@@ -210,11 +210,12 @@ static int kvm_eat_signal(CPUState *env,
     return ret;
 }
 
-
-static void kvm_eat_signals(CPUState *env, int timeout)
+static void kvm_main_loop_wait(CPUState *env, int timeout)
 {
     int r = 0;
 
+    pthread_mutex_unlock(&qemu_mutex);
+
     while (kvm_eat_signal(env, 0))
 	r = 1;
     if (!r && timeout) {
@@ -223,14 +224,10 @@ static void kvm_eat_signals(CPUState *en
 	    while (kvm_eat_signal(env, 0))
 		;
     }
-}
 
-static void kvm_main_loop_wait(CPUState *env, int timeout)
-{
-    pthread_mutex_unlock(&qemu_mutex);
-    kvm_eat_signals(env, timeout);
     pthread_mutex_lock(&qemu_mutex);
     cpu_single_env = env;
+
     vcpu_info[env->cpu_index].signalled = 0;
 }
 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone