* Re: [BUGFIX/PATCH 0/6] kvm-s390 fixes
[not found] <1211369829.6194.10.camel@cotte.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
@ 2008-05-22 9:20 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-23 10:51 ` Martin Schwidefsky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2008-05-22 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carsten Otte
Cc: Christian Borntraeger, heicars2, Martin Schwidefsky,
Olaf Schnapper, kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Carsten Otte wrote:
> Hi Avi,
>
> this series contains a few Bug fixes of issues that we've identified. I
> consider them all safe for 2.6.26, and in fact some of them fix serious
> issues in the current upstream code.
>
>
Applied and queued all. Martin, can you ack patch 2, which is in s390
code, not kvm code (although it is only triggered when kvm is invoked
AFAICT).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [BUGFIX/PATCH 0/6] kvm-s390 fixes
2008-05-22 9:20 ` [BUGFIX/PATCH 0/6] kvm-s390 fixes Avi Kivity
@ 2008-05-23 10:51 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-05-25 13:47 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Martin Schwidefsky @ 2008-05-23 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Avi Kivity
Cc: Carsten Otte, Christian Borntraeger, heicars2, Olaf Schnapper,
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 12:20 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > this series contains a few Bug fixes of issues that we've identified. I
> > consider them all safe for 2.6.26, and in fact some of them fix serious
> > issues in the current upstream code.
> >
> >
>
> Applied and queued all. Martin, can you ack patch 2, which is in s390
> code, not kvm code (although it is only triggered when kvm is invoked
> AFAICT).
You could argue about the s390_enable_sie() function if it is
architecture code or kvm code. Its sole purpose is to make it possible
to execute sie. But I've sent the Acked-by.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [BUGFIX/PATCH 0/6] kvm-s390 fixes
2008-05-23 10:51 ` Martin Schwidefsky
@ 2008-05-25 13:47 ` Avi Kivity
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Avi Kivity @ 2008-05-25 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: schwidefsky
Cc: Carsten Otte, Christian Borntraeger, heicars2, Olaf Schnapper,
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> You could argue about the s390_enable_sie() function if it is
> architecture code or kvm code. Its sole purpose is to make it possible
> to execute sie. But I've sent the Acked-by.
>
Sure, anybody who knows s390 knows that. The ack is to reassure those
few people who don't know s390 that well ;)
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-25 13:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1211369829.6194.10.camel@cotte.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
2008-05-22 9:20 ` [BUGFIX/PATCH 0/6] kvm-s390 fixes Avi Kivity
2008-05-23 10:51 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-05-25 13:47 ` Avi Kivity
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox