From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
To: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC][PATCH 3/4] kvm-vmx: KVM_EXIT_DEBUG on #BP exceptions
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 17:34:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48358460.9020805@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200805220926.52133.hollisb@us.ibm.com>
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> In addition to injecting debug interrupts, qemu should also be able to inject
> machine checks, for the case of undecoded MMIO accesses.
>
> As long as qemu can access the complete register state (e.g. including "reason
> for machine check" registers), I don't think the injection interface *needs*
> to be more complicated than "exception number".
>
> OTOH, I can see the argument for atomic injection operations, so to support
> that you'd end up with a sub-structure like kvm_exit, something like:
>
> struct kvm_inject_arch {
> u32 exception_type;
> union {
> struct machine_check {
> u32 mcsr;
> } mc;
> struct debug {
> } debug;
> };
> }
>
> This stuff is completely arch-specific, so making a common "inject" ioctl
> number that simply calls arch function (like GET_SREGS) would be appropriate.
>
>
In the mmio case, I think it makes more sense to have a 'mmio failed'
flag, and kvm can generate and inject the exception.
We mostly try to keep cpu emulation outside userspace.
(of course, that depends on what happens on real hardware. Is there a
machine check pin? or does the cpu generate the exception internally?)
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-22 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <482D9198.7040801@web.de>
2008-05-16 16:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] qemu: refactor cpu_watch/breakpoint API Jan Kiszka
2008-05-16 16:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] kvm: Arch-specifc KVM_EXIT_DEBUG payload Jan Kiszka
2008-05-21 15:59 ` [kvm-devel] " Avi Kivity
2008-05-22 13:27 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-05-21 16:04 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-22 13:42 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-05-22 13:59 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-22 14:32 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-05-22 14:35 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-16 16:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] kvm-vmx: KVM_EXIT_DEBUG on #BP exceptions Jan Kiszka
2008-05-21 16:01 ` [kvm-devel] " Avi Kivity
2008-05-22 13:31 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-05-22 13:58 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-22 14:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-05-22 14:31 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-22 14:26 ` Hollis Blanchard
2008-05-22 14:34 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-05-22 18:27 ` Hollis Blanchard
2008-05-25 10:24 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-16 16:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] kvm-userspace: use soft-BPs for guest debugging Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48358460.9020805@qumranet.com \
--to=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=hollisb@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox