From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
To: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC][PATCH 3/4] kvm-vmx: KVM_EXIT_DEBUG on #BP exceptions
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 13:24:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48393E5B.2040904@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200805221327.43434.hollisb@us.ibm.com>
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>
>> We mostly try to keep cpu emulation outside userspace.
>>
>
> Except for this debug stuff? :)
>
>
Except when it's on the wrong side of the complexity/benefit or
performance/cleanliness tradeoffs.
>> (of course, that depends on what happens on real hardware. Is there a
>> machine check pin? or does the cpu generate the exception internally?)
>>
>
> There is a machine check pin, FWIW. It's the chipset (potentially several IO
> bridges away) that discovers no device decoded the MMIO address, and
> asynchronously notifies the core.
>
> I'm happy with machine check as an "MMIO failed" flag, so I guess that leaves
> us with a separate "inject debug event" ioctl.
>
In that case it's more reasonable to have a machine check ioctl. Are
the other chipset-discovered causes of this? Perhaps on other ppc boards?
The x86 analog is triple faults. On real hardware, a triple fault
asserts a processor pin and shuts down the processor. The motherboard
detects this and causes a system reset. So we have a triple fault exit
reason, and reset generation happens in userspace.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-25 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <482D9198.7040801@web.de>
2008-05-16 16:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] qemu: refactor cpu_watch/breakpoint API Jan Kiszka
2008-05-16 16:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] kvm: Arch-specifc KVM_EXIT_DEBUG payload Jan Kiszka
2008-05-21 15:59 ` [kvm-devel] " Avi Kivity
2008-05-22 13:27 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-05-21 16:04 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-22 13:42 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-05-22 13:59 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-22 14:32 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-05-22 14:35 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-16 16:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] kvm-vmx: KVM_EXIT_DEBUG on #BP exceptions Jan Kiszka
2008-05-21 16:01 ` [kvm-devel] " Avi Kivity
2008-05-22 13:31 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-05-22 13:58 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-22 14:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-05-22 14:31 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-22 14:26 ` Hollis Blanchard
2008-05-22 14:34 ` Avi Kivity
2008-05-22 18:27 ` Hollis Blanchard
2008-05-25 10:24 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-05-16 16:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] kvm-userspace: use soft-BPs for guest debugging Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48393E5B.2040904@qumranet.com \
--to=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=hollisb@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox