From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [BUGFIX/PATCH 0/6] kvm-s390 fixes Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 16:47:03 +0300 Message-ID: <48396DD7.5010202@qumranet.com> References: <1211369829.6194.10.camel@cotte.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <48353AF9.8040600@qumranet.com> <1211539913.32214.9.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Carsten Otte , Christian Borntraeger , heicars2 , Olaf Schnapper , "kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com Return-path: Received: from bzq-179-150-194.static.bezeqint.net ([212.179.150.194]:21082 "EHLO il.qumranet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753368AbYEYNrF (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 May 2008 09:47:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1211539913.32214.9.camel@localhost> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > You could argue about the s390_enable_sie() function if it is > architecture code or kvm code. Its sole purpose is to make it possible > to execute sie. But I've sent the Acked-by. > Sure, anybody who knows s390 knows that. The ack is to reassure those few people who don't know s390 that well ;) -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function