From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] paravirt clock source patches, #4 Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:01:23 +0300 Message-ID: <4846A033.7030007@qumranet.com> References: <1212498439-1283-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <48454A38.4090907@goop.org> <48454BE5.1010007@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Ingo Molnar To: Gerd Hoffmann Return-path: Received: from bzq-179-150-194.static.bezeqint.net ([212.179.150.194]:14443 "EHLO il.qumranet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754637AbYFDOBV (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 10:01:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <48454BE5.1010007@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > >> Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> >>> paravirt clock source patches, next round. >>> >>> There is now a pvclock-abi.h file with the structs and some longish >>> comments in it and everybody is switched over to use the stuff in >>> there. >>> >> This all looks pretty good. How do you want this to get into the kernel? >> > > [ note: fixed up kvm list address: s/-owner// ] > > Good question. The kvm patches have dependencies on not-yet merged > bits, so they have to go through the kvm queue. The first two can also > go through Ingos x86 tree I guess. > > Alternativey, if Ingo acks, I'll send all five through kvm.git. Note the kvm specific patches need to be backported as we want them for 2.6.26. I can do that. (Ingo: said patches are in http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/18149) -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.