From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Subject: Re: Doubts regarding Shadow Page Table Management in KVM
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:40:10 +0300
Message-ID: <4851273A.1000802@qumranet.com>
References: <484E9267.9030800@cse.iitb.ac.in> <484F5EFA.40200@cse.iitb.ac.in>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Sukanto Ghosh <sukanto@cse.iitb.ac.in>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from il.qumranet.com ([212.179.150.194]:51797 "EHLO il.qumranet.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755769AbYFLNmU (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:42:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <484F5EFA.40200@cse.iitb.ac.in>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Sukanto Ghosh wrote:
>
> But I want to confirm whether a shadowed guest page refers to "the 
> guest PT page that has a corresponding shadow PT page. And the 
> corresponding shadow PT page is called the shadow of the former.  Am I 
> right ?

Yes.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.