From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: kvm-70 + RHEL4 + 2.6.25.7 == invalid module format Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 10:08:42 +0300 Message-ID: <485DFA7A.1030206@qumranet.com> References: <8575A1BA6D8006418FD2CD73FCC2B2E6068C68C5@xmb-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com> <485DEC6F.7050406@qumranet.com> <8575A1BA6D8006418FD2CD73FCC2B2E6068C693D@xmb-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Anoosh Hosseini (anoosh)" , kvm-devel Return-path: Received: from il.qumranet.com ([212.179.150.194]:33255 "EHLO il.qumranet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750905AbYFVHId (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jun 2008 03:08:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8575A1BA6D8006418FD2CD73FCC2B2E6068C693D@xmb-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: (re-adding kvm@) Anoosh Hosseini (anoosh) wrote: > BTW I see this issue with kvm-69. But not in kvm-68. Right now use > kvm-68's kvm-intel module along with kvm-69 simulation. Works fine. > -anoosh > I don't think anything special happened between kvm-68 and kvm-69. This might be a toolchain problem. Is your gcc/binutils toolchain completely updated? If it is, can you try bisecting to see which commit introduced the problem? -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.