From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Flush all VPID tagged TLB when VMXON
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 10:35:35 +0300
Message-ID: <485E00C7.70605@qumranet.com>
References: <200806171739.58655.sheng.yang@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: "Yang, Sheng" <sheng.yang@intel.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from il.qumranet.com ([212.179.150.194]:35270 "EHLO il.qumranet.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751037AbYFVHfX (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 22 Jun 2008 03:35:23 -0400
In-Reply-To: <200806171739.58655.sheng.yang@intel.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Yang, Sheng wrote:
> From efba05901f8ffca03208217d075f679f78f3469d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sheng Yang <sheng.yang@intel.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:41:10 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Flush all VPID tagged TLB when VMXON
>
>   

Why is this needed?  Don't we flush a vpid immediately after allocating it?

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.