From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: KVM: x86: move vapic page handling out of fast path
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:29:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <485F0A8E.3030605@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080622170558.GA6587@dmt.cnet>
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 08:00:11AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>
>>> I fail to see the point of handling the vapic page grab and ref
>>> counting in __vcpu_run's heavyweight enter/exit path.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> It's to avoid pinning the page indefinitely.
>>
>>
>>> So move it to kvm_lapic_set_vapic_addr / kvm_free_lapic time.
>>>
>>> Other than the obvious improvement for non-Flexpriority case, this
>>> kills a down_read/up_read pair in heavy exits and reduces code size.
>>>
>>>
>> With mmu notifiers we can do this and still not ping the page:
>>
>> fast path:
>>
>>
>> if (vapic_addr && !vapic_page)
>> enter_vapic();
>>
>>
>> mmu notifier:
>>
>> if (gpa == vapic_addr)
>> exit_vapic()
>>
>>
>> So let's wait with this until mmu notifiers are merged.
>>
>
> But what is the point, or advantage, of having the _any_ vapic page
> handling in __vcpu_run ?
>
> The reference for it is grabbed at kvm_lapic_set_vapic_addr() (which
> does not take any spinlock, so its safe to swapin the page) and released
> at guest exit.
>
>
The page can't be swapped out since its reference count is elevated
indefinitely.
> So, what do you have against this patch ?
>
We need to move away from reference counts, they make kvm brittle. The
patch improves the current state of things (since pages are pinned
indefinitely anyway now) but takes the wrong direction for the future.
Note that kvmclock has the same issue, so we might as well share the
solution:
struct kvm_fast_guest_page {
gfn_t gfn;
struct page *page;
spinlock_t lock;
struct list_head link;
}
The mmu notifier callbacks can scan this list and null any pages that
match the gfn being cleared, but in the normal cast, ->page can be
accessed directly.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-23 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-19 17:43 KVM: x86: move vapic page handling out of fast path Marcelo Tosatti
2008-06-22 5:00 ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-22 17:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-06-23 2:29 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-06-23 14:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-23 15:04 Marcelo Tosatti
2008-06-29 11:53 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=485F0A8E.3030605@qumranet.com \
--to=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox