From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>,
kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: KVM: pvmmu breakage with gcc 4.3.0
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:47:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48638FE2.1020005@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <486380DB.9070905@qumranet.com>
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> Some pvmmu functions store their commands on stack, and newer GCC
>> versions conclude that these commands are unused.
>>
>> So stick an inline asm statement to convince the compiler otherwise.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>> index 8b7a3cf..c892752 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>> @@ -55,6 +55,12 @@ static void kvm_mmu_op(void *buffer, unsigned len)
>> int r;
>> unsigned long a1, a2;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * GCC 4.3.0 concludes that on-stack kvm_mmu_op* is unused and
>> + * optimizes its initialization away.
>> + */
>> + asm ("" : : "p" (buffer));
>> +
>>
>
> I don't think "p" should force the contents into memory? Perhaps
> "m"(*(char *)buffer)?
>
> Anthony, I don't see why a memory clobber would tell gcc that the
> variables is actually used.
It doesn't, but it seems to me that it should force GCC to assume
everything is live. It's a big stick to hit the problem with but it
seems like the right thing semantically.
> The problem is with the void * -> unsigned long cast (__pa), once
> that happens gcc loses track. It's probably needed anyway since
> hypercalls _do_ clobber memory.
Right, it's not telling GCC that we touch a particular variable, but
rather that we may have touched any variable.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-26 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-26 2:10 KVM: pvmmu breakage with gcc 4.3.0 Marcelo Tosatti
2008-06-26 3:10 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-26 13:18 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-26 18:06 ` Alexandre Oliva
2008-06-29 8:56 ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-26 11:43 ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-26 12:47 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2008-06-27 16:11 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-06-26 15:08 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-26 15:21 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-26 15:41 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-26 16:34 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-29 10:16 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48638FE2.1020005@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=aoliva@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox