From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Performance guarantees Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:11:55 +0200 Message-ID: <486A736B.9070000@firstfloor.org> References: <1306.10.9.1.37.1214898552.squirrel@www.cse.iitb.ac.in><1344.10.9.1.37.1214898905.squirrel@www.cse.iitb.ac.in> <87hcb9tzwe.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <3400.10.9.1.37.1214934774.squirrel@www.cse.iitb.ac.in> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Sukanto Ghosh Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:46358 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752275AbYGASMD (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 14:12:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3400.10.9.1.37.1214934774.squirrel@www.cse.iitb.ac.in> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sukanto Ghosh wrote: >> The hierarchical group scheduler and "memory cgroup" work that is being >> worked on in recent kernels should be able to do i) and ii). >> > > Are these features already part of 2.6.26 They are, at least in a preliminary form. > By 'hierarchical group scheduler', do you mean 'Fair CPU Scheduler for > Linux' (http://fairsched.sourceforge.net/doc/fairsched.txt) No. -Andi