From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: QEMU Accel - git tree
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:51:04 +0200
Message-ID: <48721138.1010908@redhat.com>
References: <5d6222a80807041340j367cfe3ah67a9d771caa0ee63@mail.gmail.com>	<20080704213844.GB29672@tapir> <5d6222a80807041427t5510c2f5y172b3674697728ef@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <carenas@sajinet.com.pe>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>,
	Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:50292 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752676AbYGGMzX (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 7 Jul 2008 08:55:23 -0400
In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80807041427t5510c2f5y172b3674697728ef@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Glauber Costa wrote:
> Talking to hollis last week, he pointed out that a better solution
> would be to make all of them to use the same kernel interface. It's a
> valid approach, but I believe an user-space interface would be more
> flexible. That's why I'm still maintaining this set (now in tree-form
> ;-) )

Especially in case we'll add xen to the picture ...

cheers,
  Gerd

-- 
http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/xenner/