From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
To: carsteno@de.ibm.com
Cc: "Yang, Sheng" <sheng.yang@intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>,
Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
xiantao.zhang@intel.com, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] kvmtrace: make cycle calculation architecture aware
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:41:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <487A2210.5020602@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48770CEF.6090102@de.ibm.com>
Carsten Otte wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>> What is the overhead of ktime_get()?
> I think I'd like an arch specific timestamp. This way we could use our
> clock-cycle-granularity-non-privileged-timestamp instruction ;-). If
> we need a common implementation, I don't think there's much difference
> between different syscalls in terms of overhead.
This is all in-kernel, so no syscalls. Since I doubt you need sub-ns
granularity for kvmtrace, can we do without an arch hook?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-13 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-07 13:56 [PATCH 0/5] kvmtrace: add powerpc support for KVM_TRACE ehrhardt
2008-07-07 13:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] kvmtrace: Remove use of bit fields in kvm trace structure v3 ehrhardt
2008-07-07 13:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] kvmtrace: make cycle calculation architecture aware ehrhardt
2008-07-07 15:45 ` Hollis Blanchard
2008-07-09 8:25 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2008-07-07 16:37 ` Hollis Blanchard
2008-07-09 9:17 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2008-07-09 15:03 ` Hollis Blanchard
2008-07-10 10:22 ` Yang, Sheng
2008-07-10 10:24 ` Yang, Sheng
2008-07-10 13:32 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-11 1:06 ` Yang, Sheng
2008-07-11 7:34 ` Carsten Otte
2008-07-11 15:19 ` Hollis Blanchard
2008-07-13 15:41 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-07-14 7:44 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-07-07 13:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] kvmppc: kvmtrace: enable KVM_TRACE building for powerpc ehrhardt
2008-07-07 13:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] kvmppc: kvmtrace: adds trace points for ppc tlb activity v2 ehrhardt
2008-07-07 13:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] kvmppc: kvmtrace: trace powerpc instruction emulation ehrhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=487A2210.5020602@qumranet.com \
--to=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=carsteno@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hollisb@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sheng.yang@intel.com \
--cc=xiantao.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox