From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Remove application name decoration Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:54:22 +0300 Message-ID: <48819DAE.1070901@qumranet.com> References: <1216327643-12665-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from il.qumranet.com ([212.179.150.194]:57086 "EHLO il.qumranet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751308AbYGSHy0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2008 03:54:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1216327643-12665-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Anthony Liguori wrote: > Decorating the application name is not the best way to let users figure out > if KVM is enabled or not. It's impossible for management applications to > figure out, inconsistent with other accelerators like kqemu, and clutters the > title bar. > > We may experience a little user pain in the short term since we've told users to > look for it to determine if KVM is enabled or not but having a proper monitor > command is better in the long run. > > I also think it will be hard to merge this into upstream QEMU whereas a monitor > command will be obvious to merge. > Applied both patches, thanks. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.