From: Dor Laor <dor.laor@qumranet.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Remove -tdf
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:03:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48865934.8070007@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1216756217-21888-2-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> The last time I posted the KVM patch series to qemu-devel, the -tdf patch met with
> some opposition. Since today we implement timer catch-up in the in-kernel PIT and
> the in-kernel PIT is used by default, it doesn't seem all that valuable to have
> timer catch-up in userspace too.
>
> Removing it will reduce our divergence from QEMU.
>
>
IMHO the in kernel PIT should go away, there is no reason to keep it
except that userspace PIT drifts.
Currently both in-kernel PIT and even the in kernel irqchips are not
100% bullet proof.
Of course this code is a hack, Gleb Natapov has send better fix for
PIT/RTC to qemu list.
Can you look into them:
http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg01181.html
Thanks, Dor
> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
>
> diff --git a/qemu/hw/i8254.c b/qemu/hw/i8254.c
> index 69eb889..d0394c0 100644
> --- a/qemu/hw/i8254.c
> +++ b/qemu/hw/i8254.c
> @@ -332,11 +332,6 @@ static uint32_t pit_ioport_read(void *opaque, uint32_t addr)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -/* global counters for time-drift fix */
> -int64_t timer_acks=0, timer_interrupts=0, timer_ints_to_push=0;
> -
> -extern int time_drift_fix;
> -
> static void pit_irq_timer_update(PITChannelState *s, int64_t current_time)
> {
> int64_t expire_time;
> @@ -347,24 +342,6 @@ static void pit_irq_timer_update(PITChannelState *s, int64_t current_time)
> expire_time = pit_get_next_transition_time(s, current_time);
> irq_level = pit_get_out1(s, current_time);
> qemu_set_irq(s->irq, irq_level);
> - if (time_drift_fix && irq_level==1) {
> - /* FIXME: fine tune timer_max_fix (max fix per tick).
> - * Should it be 1 (double time), 2 , 4, 10 ?
> - * Currently setting it to 5% of PIT-ticks-per-second (per PIT-tick)
> - */
> - const long pit_ticks_per_sec = (s->count>0) ? (PIT_FREQ/s->count) : 0;
> - const long timer_max_fix = pit_ticks_per_sec/20;
> - const long delta = timer_interrupts - timer_acks;
> - const long max_delta = pit_ticks_per_sec * 60; /* one minute */
> - if ((delta > max_delta) && (pit_ticks_per_sec > 0)) {
> - printf("time drift is too long, %ld seconds were lost\n", delta/pit_ticks_per_sec);
> - timer_acks = timer_interrupts;
> - timer_ints_to_push = 0;
> - } else if (delta > 0) {
> - timer_ints_to_push = MIN(delta, timer_max_fix);
> - }
> - timer_interrupts++;
> - }
> #ifdef DEBUG_PIT
> printf("irq_level=%d next_delay=%f\n",
> irq_level,
> diff --git a/qemu/hw/i8259.c b/qemu/hw/i8259.c
> index b266119..1707434 100644
> --- a/qemu/hw/i8259.c
> +++ b/qemu/hw/i8259.c
> @@ -221,35 +221,18 @@ static inline void pic_intack(PicState *s, int irq)
> } else {
> s->isr |= (1 << irq);
> }
> -
> /* We don't clear a level sensitive interrupt here */
> if (!(s->elcr & (1 << irq)))
> s->irr &= ~(1 << irq);
> -
> }
>
> -extern int time_drift_fix;
> -
> int pic_read_irq(PicState2 *s)
> {
> int irq, irq2, intno;
>
> irq = pic_get_irq(&s->pics[0]);
> if (irq >= 0) {
> -
> pic_intack(&s->pics[0], irq);
> -#ifndef TARGET_IA64
> - if (time_drift_fix && irq == 0) {
> - extern int64_t timer_acks, timer_ints_to_push;
> - timer_acks++;
> - if (timer_ints_to_push > 0) {
> - timer_ints_to_push--;
> - /* simulate an edge irq0, like the one generated by i8254 */
> - pic_set_irq1(&s->pics[0], 0, 0);
> - pic_set_irq1(&s->pics[0], 0, 1);
> - }
> - }
> -#endif
> if (irq == 2) {
> irq2 = pic_get_irq(&s->pics[1]);
> if (irq2 >= 0) {
> diff --git a/qemu/vl.c b/qemu/vl.c
> index 19c8bbf..d6877cd 100644
> --- a/qemu/vl.c
> +++ b/qemu/vl.c
> @@ -229,7 +229,6 @@ const char *option_rom[MAX_OPTION_ROMS];
> int nb_option_roms;
> int semihosting_enabled = 0;
> int autostart = 1;
> -int time_drift_fix = 0;
> unsigned int kvm_shadow_memory = 0;
> const char *mem_path = NULL;
> int hpagesize = 0;
> @@ -7968,7 +7967,6 @@ static void help(int exitcode)
> #ifndef _WIN32
> "-daemonize daemonize QEMU after initializing\n"
> #endif
> - "-tdf inject timer interrupts that got lost\n"
> "-kvm-shadow-memory megs set the amount of shadow pages to be allocated\n"
> "-mem-path set the path to hugetlbfs/tmpfs mounted directory, also enables allocation of guest memory with huge pages\n"
> "-option-rom rom load a file, rom, into the option ROM space\n"
> @@ -8089,7 +8087,6 @@ enum {
> QEMU_OPTION_tb_size,
> QEMU_OPTION_icount,
> QEMU_OPTION_incoming,
> - QEMU_OPTION_tdf,
> QEMU_OPTION_kvm_shadow_memory,
> QEMU_OPTION_mempath,
> };
> @@ -8202,7 +8199,6 @@ const QEMUOption qemu_options[] = {
> #if defined(TARGET_ARM) || defined(TARGET_M68K)
> { "semihosting", 0, QEMU_OPTION_semihosting },
> #endif
> - { "tdf", 0, QEMU_OPTION_tdf }, /* enable time drift fix */
> { "kvm-shadow-memory", HAS_ARG, QEMU_OPTION_kvm_shadow_memory },
> { "name", HAS_ARG, QEMU_OPTION_name },
> #if defined(TARGET_SPARC)
> @@ -9092,9 +9088,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> case QEMU_OPTION_semihosting:
> semihosting_enabled = 1;
> break;
> - case QEMU_OPTION_tdf:
> - time_drift_fix = 1;
> - break;
> case QEMU_OPTION_kvm_shadow_memory:
> kvm_shadow_memory = (int64_t)atoi(optarg) * 1024 * 1024 / 4096;
> break;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-22 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-22 19:50 [PATCH 1/2] Fix bad merge Anthony Liguori
2008-07-22 19:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] Remove -tdf Anthony Liguori
2008-07-22 22:03 ` Dor Laor [this message]
2008-07-23 1:20 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-23 2:46 ` David S. Ahern
2008-07-23 5:58 ` Gleb Natapov
2008-07-23 15:31 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-24 22:55 ` Dor Laor
2008-07-27 9:38 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-27 8:05 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-27 8:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] Fix bad merge Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48865934.8070007@qumranet.com \
--to=dor.laor@qumranet.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox