From: "David S. Ahern" <daahern@cisco.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kvm guest loops_per_jiffy miscalibration under host load
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:57:22 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48869E12.40804@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48863B5C.9040203@cisco.com>
David S. Ahern wrote:
>> The in-kernel PIT rearms relative to host clock, so the frequency is
>> more reliable (next_expiration = prev_expiration + count).
>>
>> So for RHEL4, clock=pit along with the following patch seems stable for
>> me, no drift either direction, even under guest/host load. Can you give
>> it a try with RHEL3 ? I'll be doing that shortly.
>
> I'll give it a shot and let you know.
After 6:46 of uptime, my RHEL4 guest is only 7 seconds ahead of the
host. The RHEL3 guest is 17 seconds ahead. Both are dramatic
improvements with the patch.
david
>>
>> ----------
>>
>> Set the count load time to when the count is actually "loaded", not when
>> IRQ is injected.
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c b/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c
>> index c0f7872..b39b141 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c
>> @@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ static int __pit_timer_fn(struct kvm_kpit_state *ps)
>>
>> pt->timer.expires = ktime_add_ns(pt->timer.expires, pt->period);
>> pt->scheduled = ktime_to_ns(pt->timer.expires);
>> + ps->channels[0].count_load_time = pt->timer.expires;
>>
>> return (pt->period == 0 ? 0 : 1);
>> }
>> @@ -622,7 +623,6 @@ void kvm_pit_timer_intr_post(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vec)
>> arch->vioapic->redirtbl[0].fields.mask != 1))) {
>> ps->inject_pending = 1;
>> atomic_dec(&ps->pit_timer.pending);
>> - ps->channels[0].count_load_time = ktime_get();
>> }
>> }
>> }
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-23 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-22 3:25 kvm guest loops_per_jiffy miscalibration under host load Marcelo Tosatti
2008-07-22 8:22 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-07-22 12:49 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-07-22 15:54 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-07-22 22:00 ` Dor Laor
2008-07-22 19:56 ` David S. Ahern
2008-07-23 2:57 ` David S. Ahern [this message]
2008-07-29 14:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-07-29 16:06 ` PIT/ntp/timekeeping [was Re: kvm guest loops_per_jiffy miscalibration under host load] David S. Ahern
2008-07-29 17:29 ` David S. Ahern
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-02 16:40 kvm guest loops_per_jiffy miscalibration under host load Marcelo Tosatti
2008-07-03 13:17 ` Glauber Costa
2008-07-04 22:51 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-07-07 1:56 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-07 18:27 ` Glauber Costa
2008-07-07 18:48 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-07-07 19:21 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-07 19:32 ` Glauber Costa
2008-07-07 21:35 ` Glauber Costa
2008-07-11 21:18 ` David S. Ahern
2008-07-12 14:10 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-07-12 19:28 ` David S. Ahern
2008-07-07 18:17 ` Daniel P. Berrange
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48869E12.40804@cisco.com \
--to=daahern@cisco.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox