From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 5] PowerPC patches for 2.6.27 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:00:14 +0300 Message-ID: <488F145E.6040708@qumranet.com> References: <488C36DE.70507@qumranet.com> <200807290920.17035.ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Hollis Blanchard , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Christian Ehrhardt Return-path: Received: from il.qumranet.com ([212.179.150.194]:12411 "EHLO il.qumranet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752876AbYG2NAP (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:00:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200807290920.17035.ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Christian Ehrhardt wrote: >> Applied all; thanks. I prefer to only merge bug fixes at this time for >> 2.6.27. As far as I can tell, patch 2 is independent of the rest so >> I'll queue that. Let me know if that works. >> > > Yes these patches are independent - for the type question you can consider > 1/5 - feature > 2/5 - bug fix > 3,4,5/5 - yeah what is it .. neither a pure bug fix nor a feature let's call > it "performance fix" > > We tested most of those performance fixes at least 1.5 Months now, having them > applied while developing new things on top and I feel very good with 3&4. > It would be nice if at least the performance fixes 3&4 could go in now under > the bug fix label too, but it's up to you. > Please send patches as soon as you feel confident about them; I can easily fold fixes (or drop patches) later. Sending larger changes post merge window is sure to attract flames. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function