From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] husb: support for USB host device auto connect.
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:41:28 -0500
Message-ID: <48A49878.1010502@codemonkey.ws>
References: <cover.1218685607.git.maxk@kernel.org> <bc54baf4e955c96be17282e99323f11dcf070a4e.1218685608.git.maxk@kernel.org> <48A46033.3070200@codemonkey.ws> <48A489D3.5070900@kernel.org> <48A493DE.40506@codemonkey.ws> <48A496E9.2030800@kernel.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@kernel.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.239]:39659 "EHLO
	wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752001AbYHNUmI (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:42:08 -0400
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 69so709179wri.5
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <48A496E9.2030800@kernel.org>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Max Krasnyansky wrote:
>>> Do you mind if we do something like that incrementally ?
>>>   
>>>       
>> Yeah, I don't really want to have QEMU depend on dbus so in this case,
>> polling would be better.
>>     
>
> I'm thinking that maybe we could use 'inotify' on /proc/bus/usb.
> Would you be ok with 'inotify' ?
>   

Yeah, but I would be a little surprised if /proc/bus/usb supports inotify...

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Max
>