From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] Clean up VINTR setting Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:13:01 +0300 Message-ID: <48BBEA5D.20508@qumranet.com> References: <1220270281-15720-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <1220270281-15720-2-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <1220270281-15720-3-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org, anthony@codemonkey.ws To: Alexander Graf Return-path: Received: from il.qumranet.com ([212.179.150.194]:16443 "EHLO il.qumranet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750831AbYIANNG (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Sep 2008 09:13:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1220270281-15720-3-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Alexander Graf wrote: > The current VINTR intercept setters don't look clean to me. To make > the code easier to read and enable the possibilty to trap on a VINTR > set, this uses a helper function to set the VINTR intercept. > > +static void svm_set_vintr(struct vcpu_svm *svm, bool on) > +{ > + if (on) { > + svm->vmcb->control.intercept |= 1ULL << INTERCEPT_VINTR; > + } else { > + svm->vmcb->control.intercept &= ~(1ULL << INTERCEPT_VINTR); > + } > +} > + > svm_set_vintr() + svm_clear_vintr() would be even clearer IMO. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function