From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Cc: KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: 63 sectors
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:26:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48BE7467.3080900@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48BE46DD.1070703@qumranet.com>
> I can think of a few workarounds, all bad:
> - add a partitioning tool (or option to qemu-img) to format the disk,
> placing the first partition on the fourth cylinder, aligning it. tell
> the users not to wipe the disks out but instead install to one of the
> existing parititions
Well, that one slightly modified could work out quite well, at least for
linux.
As far I know the linux kernel uses the geometry provided by the storage
adapter only in case the disk is blank. If there is a partition table
present on the disk, the linux kernel will calculate the geometry based
on that.
Background for this is that scsi disks have no disk geometry, they just
have a bunch of sectors. The scsi hostadapter bioses have to pull out
some geometry out of thin air to satisfy ms-dos and real os boot
loaders, and there was no standard on how to do that. Thus moving disks
from one scsi adapter to another may result in hba-reported and on-disk
geometry being different, and the only sane way to deal with that is
using the on-disk geometry. With LBA this is much less an issue these
days though.
So qemu-img could create a partition table, containing one partition,
hinting 32 sectors/cylinder. Linux should keep that geometry then, even
when distro installers are deleting the partition and creating their own
scheme.
Dunno how what *BSD or Windows guests will deal with that though.
cheers,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-03 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-03 8:12 63 sectors Avi Kivity
2008-09-03 8:35 ` David Mair
2008-09-03 9:32 ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-03 11:26 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2008-09-04 8:49 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2008-09-03 16:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-04 3:20 ` Liu Yu-B13201
2008-09-04 3:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-04 3:39 ` Liu Yu-B13201
2008-09-04 3:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-04 7:47 ` Itamar Heim
2008-09-07 8:20 ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-04 8:58 ` Ian Kirk
2008-09-04 11:15 ` Laurent Vivier
2008-09-04 12:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-04 13:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-04 17:56 ` Charles Duffy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48BE7467.3080900@redhat.com \
--to=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox