From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
To: "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm/ia64: Add printk support for kvm-intel modules.
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:19:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48C7E59C.2020000@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC0196D6BB@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Resend.
> Avi,
> Please help to apply it, Thanks!
> Xiantao
>
>
(sorry for the late review)
> Since this module will be reloated to an isolated address
> space from host side, so kvm-intel can't call printk of host
> kernel. This patch implements the printk function for kvm-intel
> module, so it doesn't need to suffer no-printk pains.
>
>
> +#define BYTES_PER_LOG 1024
> +
> +struct kvm_vmm_log {
> + spinlock_t log_lock;
> + unsigned long w_pointer;
> + unsigned long r_pointer;
> + char log_slot[VMM_LOG_SIZE/BYTES_PER_LOG][BYTES_PER_LOG - 1];
> +};
> +
>
1024 bytes per line? that's wasteful.
Why not variable size records?
>
> +static void vcpu_print_vmm_log(void)
> +{
> + unsigned int slot;
> +
> + spin_lock(&vmm_log->log_lock);
>
You're going to impact scalability with this. Are per-vcpu logs workable?
> @@ -1011,6 +1030,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_translate(struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu,
>
> static int kvm_alloc_vmm_area(void)
> {
> +
>
blank line?
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm_lib.c b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm_lib.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..4c43efe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm_lib.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +
> +/*
> + * vsprintf.c: Let kvm-intel module has the ability to use print
> functions.
> + * Just include kernel's library, and disable symbols export.
> + * Copyright (C) 2008, Intel Corporation.
> + * Xiantao Zhang (xiantao.zhang@intel.com)
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#undef CONFIG_MODULES
> +
> +#include "../../../lib/vsprintf.c"
> +#include "../../../lib/ctype.c"
>
I suspect this will start breaking when people start using the new
printk("%pBLAH") functionality, which will require linking additional files.
Is it possible to pass the format string and the arguments in the log
record instead, and do the printk() in the kernel?
I can't think of a way on x86, but maybe ia64 varargs are different.
(worst case you can limit the number of arguments and just copy a bunch
of stack).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-10 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-09 15:11 [PATCH] kvm/ia64: Add printk support for kvm-intel modules Zhang, Xiantao
2008-09-10 15:19 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-09-11 3:15 ` Zhang, Xiantao
2008-09-11 8:12 ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-12 7:14 ` Zhang, Xiantao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48C7E59C.2020000@qumranet.com \
--to=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiantao.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox