From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: Network Overruns Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 04:03:10 +0300 Message-ID: <48CC62CE.6070101@qumranet.com> References: <48CAA711.8060302@theplayboymansion.net> <48CB4B24.8090505@qumranet.com> <519a8b110809130118sd392d38lb11fe2fa004638c9@mail.gmail.com> <48CBD1C3.4020006@qumranet.com> <519a8b110809131600vbee71cbv6774e0d4ce2f4238@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel To: xming Return-path: Received: from il.qumranet.com ([212.179.150.194]:19329 "EHLO il.qumranet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753100AbYINBDQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2008 21:03:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <519a8b110809131600vbee71cbv6774e0d4ce2f4238@mail.gmail.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: (re-adding list) xming wrote: >> What NIC model are you using in the guest? >> > > I have tried 8319, e1000 and virtio both had stalls. I am using virtio > with txqueuelen 1500 on the tap. > I didin't had this proble with kvm 69, 70. > What is the oldest version that doesn't work? (i.e. when was the regression introduced?) -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.