From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Device Assignment with VT-d
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:18:30 -0700
Message-ID: <48CFF876.8000801@redhat.com>
References: <20080916005853.7876D250DB2@il.qumranet.com> <1221568935.4172.22.camel@frecb07144>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:53997 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754176AbYIPSUR (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:20:17 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1221568935.4172.22.camel@frecb07144>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> @@ -1147,6 +1157,9 @@ int kvm_dev_ioctl_check_extension(long ext)
>>  	case KVM_CAP_PV_MMU:
>>  		r = !tdp_enabled;
>>  		break;
>> +	case KVM_CAP_IOMMU:
>> +		r = intel_iommu_found();
>> +		break;
>>     
>
> Must depend on CONFIG_DMAR too
>   

Rather, intel_iommu_found() should be defined (and return zero) if 
!CONFIG_DMAR.

(what's a dmar?)

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.