From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: "Yang, Sheng" <sheng.yang@intel.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: VMX: Host NMI triggering on NMI vmexit
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:47:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48D8AD3A.1040509@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200809231334.27219.sheng.yang@intel.com>
Yang, Sheng wrote:
> On Monday 22 September 2008 19:00:38 Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> Maybe the answer is to generate the local nmi via an IPI-to-self command
>>>> to the local apic.
>>> Going this way leaves me with a few questions: Will it be OK for the
>>> related mainainers to export the required service?
>> If we can make a case for it (I think we can), then I don't see why not.
>>
>> Sheng, can you confirm that 'int 2' is problematic, and that
>> nmi-via-lapic is the best workaround?
>
> Just back from vacation... :)
>
> Jan said is true, "int 2" itself won't block subsequent NMIs. But I think it's
> too obviously as a hardware issue when using with NMI exiting=1 in vmx
> nonroot mode, so I have checked it with my colleague, finally found these in
> SDM 3B 23-2:
>
> The following bullets detail when architectural state is and is not updated in
> response to VM exits:
> • If an event causes a VM exit *directly*, it does not update architectural
> state as it would have if it had it not caused the VM exit:
> [...]
> — *An NMI causes subsequent NMIs to be blocked*, but only after the VM exit
> completes.
>
> So we needn't worry about that, and this shouldn't cause any trouble AFAIK...
Fine, problems--. :)
>
> Jan, seems we need to do more investigating on the issues you met...
Sorry, which one do you mean now?
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-23 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-16 11:26 VMX: Host NMI triggering on NMI vmexit Jan Kiszka
2008-09-19 22:37 ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-20 6:55 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-09-22 10:54 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-09-22 11:00 ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-23 5:34 ` Yang, Sheng
2008-09-23 8:47 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2008-09-23 8:57 ` Yang, Sheng
2008-09-23 8:59 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48D8AD3A.1040509@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sheng.yang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox