From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Remaining passthrough/VT-d tasks list
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:34:22 +0300
Message-ID: <48D9FB8E.9060505@redhat.com>
References: <0122C7C995D32147B66BF4F440D3016301C49E61@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
	benami@il.ibm.com, muli@il.ibm.com,
	"Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@intel.com>,
	"Yang, Sheng" <sheng.yang@intel.com>,
	"Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>
To: "Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@intel.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:54821 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751528AbYIXIfi (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 24 Sep 2008 04:35:38 -0400
In-Reply-To: <0122C7C995D32147B66BF4F440D3016301C49E61@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Han, Weidong wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The initial passthrough/VT-d patches have been in kvm, it's time to
> enhance it, and push them into 2.6.28.
>
> 	- Shared Interrupt support
>   

Shared guest interrupts is a prerequisite for merging into mainline.  
Without this, device assignment is useless in anything but a benchmark 
scenario.  I won't push device assignment for 2.6.28 without it.

Shared host interrupts are a different matter; which one did you mean?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function