From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: Remaining passthrough/VT-d tasks list Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:46:31 +0300 Message-ID: <48DA1A87.5010908@redhat.com> References: <0122C7C995D32147B66BF4F440D3016301C49E61@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com> <200809241311.51678.amit.shah@redhat.com> <48D9FE77.4010000@redhat.com> <200809241528.04915.amit.shah@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Yang, Sheng" , "Han, Weidong" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "benami@il.ibm.com" , "muli@il.ibm.com" , "Kay, Allen M" , "Zhang, Xiantao" To: Amit Shah Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:47688 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751648AbYIXKr7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Sep 2008 06:47:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200809241528.04915.amit.shah@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Amit Shah wrote: > * On Wednesday 24 Sep 2008 14:16:47 Avi Kivity wrote: > >> Amit Shah wrote: >> >>> I'd say we have about 3 weeks to get things in. >>> >> How do you figure? 2.6.26 was released July 13, we're more than 2.5 >> months later. >> > > A week for 2.6.28 to open and two weeks for the rc1 window. > > >> Furthermore, I'm not queueing untested patches for 2.6.28 at this time. >> > > Of course, I'm not advocating this! If they're tested by Intel, we can push > them in. > No, the patches have to be in my tree some time before the merge window opens. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function