From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jes Sorensen Subject: change in 'smp_cpus' at runtime vs vcpu_info? Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:17:01 +0200 Message-ID: <48DCEEDD.4000901@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kvm@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:50520 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752061AbYIZORF (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:17:05 -0400 Received: from eye3.emea.sgi.com (eye3.emea.sgi.com [144.253.156.24]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E91D8F80E2 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 07:17:02 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, Looking through the KVM qemu code, I see nothing that indicates that smp_cpus can be increased after qemu is initially launched? Does anyone see any reason why we couldn't allocate the vcpu_info array at launch time based on the value of smp_cpus? Right now vcpu_info is a static array and I would love to get rid of this limitation if possible. Cheers, Jes