From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] VMX: work around lacking VNMI support
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:57:56 +0300
Message-ID: <48DE11B4.5060101@redhat.com>
References: <48D74CE6.5060008@siemens.com> <48D7504B.7050102@siemens.com> <48DB5CC3.5010104@siemens.com> <48DB688B.6020307@redhat.com> <48DB9EAD.2070709@siemens.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Yang, Sheng" <sheng.yang@intel.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@qumranet.com>,
	kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:56124 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752288AbYI0K56 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 27 Sep 2008 06:57:58 -0400
In-Reply-To: <48DB9EAD.2070709@siemens.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> As a workaround (or safety bag), is it imaginable to delay or deny VCPU
> snapshots at not yet fully restorable points (like
> GUEST_INTERRUPTIBILITY_INFO != 0)? Or stick-your-head-into-the-sand for now?
>
>   

Head in sand.  The points where we have interrupt shadows should be 
extremely rare, and the points where it matters even rarer.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.