From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Is it ok to compile kvm with gcc-4.1.2?
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:11:04 +0300
Message-ID: <48E627F8.5010301@redhat.com>
References: <48E53C8B.1030600@schrodinger.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Simon Gao <gao@schrodinger.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:41388 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752099AbYJCOLC (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:11:02 -0400
In-Reply-To: <48E53C8B.1030600@schrodinger.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Simon Gao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it ok to use gcc-4.1.2 to compile kvm module and utility tools now?
> Or is gcc-3.x.x still required?
>
>   

gcc 4 is supported.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.