From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gerd Hoffmann Subject: Re: thread/core siblings info for guests Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:23:16 +0200 Message-ID: <48E9E714.1030601@redhat.com> References: <8EA2C2C4116BF44AB370468FBF85A7779B418DEF@orsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com> <48E88C62.9030103@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Kamble, Nitin A" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:48791 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751724AbYJFKXV (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2008 06:23:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <48E88C62.9030103@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Avi Kivity wrote: > > Not that I know of. Indeed finer control over cpuid is needed. We need > to support at least three modes: > > - default: expose some machine that is likely to be widely supported > - host: expose as much of the host cpu as we can > - managed: management application controls everything qemu has an array with predefined cpu types, selectable via -cpu . IMHO it would be a good idea to reuse that, especially with the upstream merge in mind ... cheers, Gerd