From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] VT-d: Support multiple device assignment to one guest Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:32:52 +0200 Message-ID: <48EF0524.8070505@redhat.com> References: <48EDFE00.5050103@redhat.com> <0122C7C995D32147B66BF4F440D3016301CB08EF@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com> <0122C7C995D32147B66BF4F440D3016301D55E1A@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com> <48EEF8CC.5000309@redhat.com> <0122C7C995D32147B66BF4F440D3016301D55F54@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Joerg Roedel , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Amit Shah , "Kay, Allen M" , "Yang, Sheng" , benami@il.ibm.com, muli@il.ibm.com, "Woodhouse, David" , "Barnes, Jesse" To: "Han, Weidong" Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:53578 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752111AbYJJHfI (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:35:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <0122C7C995D32147B66BF4F440D3016301D55F54@pdsmsx415.ccr.corp.intel.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Han, Weidong wrote: >> >> 2.6.27 is out, so anything we do will be for 2.6.29. >> > > Do you mean the VT-d patches which haven't been checked in won't be > pushed into 2.6.28? > Yes. The only exception is the guest interrupt sharing patch, which is awaiting testing. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.