public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com, david@redhat.com,
	thuth@redhat.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: introduce module parameter kvm.use_gisa
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:43:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48bbf704-11c7-0f67-a5ca-ae2841faccde@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c16f65a7-5711-96e2-1527-fa13eab9f5ca@de.ibm.com>



On 27.02.20 13:27, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 27.02.20 10:10, Michael Mueller wrote:
>> The boolean module parameter "kvm.use_gisa" controls if newly
>> created guests will use the GISA facility if provided by the
>> host system. The default is yes.
>>
>>    # cat /sys/module/kvm/parameters/use_gisa
>>    Y
>>
>> The parameter can be changed on the fly.
>>
>>    # echo N > /sys/module/kvm/parameters/use_gisa
>>
>> Already running guests are not affected by this change.
>>
>> The kvm s390 debug feature shows if a guest is running with GISA.
>>
>>    # grep gisa /sys/kernel/debug/s390dbf/kvm-$pid/sprintf
>>    00 01582725059:843303 3 - 08 00000000e119bc01  gisa 0x00000000c9ac2642 initialized
>>    00 01582725059:903840 3 - 11 000000004391ee22  00[0000000000000000-0000000000000000]: AIV gisa format-1 enabled for cpu 000
>>    ...
>>    00 01582725059:916847 3 - 08 0000000094fff572  gisa 0x00000000c9ac2642 cleared
>>
>> In general, that value should not be changed as the GISA facility
>> enhances interruption delivery performance.
>>
>> A reason to switch the GISA facility off might be a performance
>> comparison run or debugging.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Looks good to me. Regarding the other comments, I think allowing for dynamic changes
> and keeping use_gisa vs disable_gisa makes sense. So I would think that the patch
> as is makes sense.
> 
> The only question is: shall we set use_gisa to 0 when the machine does not support
> it (e.g. VSIE?) and then also forbid setting it to 1? Could be overkill.

Then I would rename the parameter to "try_to_use_gisa" instead. (a joke 
;) )

In that case we exit gisa_init() because of the missing AIV facility.

void kvm_s390_gisa_init(struct kvm *kvm)
{
         struct kvm_s390_gisa_interrupt *gi = &kvm->arch.gisa_int;

-->	if (!css_general_characteristics.aiv)
                 return;
         gi->origin = &kvm->arch.sie_page2->gisa;
         gi->alert.mask = 0;
	...
}


Thanks,
Michael

> 
> 
>> ---
>>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 8 +++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> index d7ff30e45589..5c2081488024 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> @@ -184,6 +184,11 @@ static u8 halt_poll_max_steal = 10;
>>   module_param(halt_poll_max_steal, byte, 0644);
>>   MODULE_PARM_DESC(halt_poll_max_steal, "Maximum percentage of steal time to allow polling");
>>   
>> +/* if set to true, the GISA will be initialized and used if available */
>> +static bool use_gisa  = true;
>> +module_param(use_gisa, bool, 0644);
>> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(use_gisa, "Use the GISA if the host supports it.");
>> +
>>   /*
>>    * For now we handle at most 16 double words as this is what the s390 base
>>    * kernel handles and stores in the prefix page. If we ever need to go beyond
>> @@ -2504,7 +2509,8 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
>>   	kvm->arch.use_skf = sclp.has_skey;
>>   	spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.start_stop_lock);
>>   	kvm_s390_vsie_init(kvm);
>> -	kvm_s390_gisa_init(kvm);
>> +	if (use_gisa)
>> +		kvm_s390_gisa_init(kvm);
>>   	KVM_EVENT(3, "vm 0x%pK created by pid %u", kvm, current->pid);
>>   
>>   	return 0;
>>
> 

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Michael Müller

IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Gregor Pillen
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294


  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-27 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-27  9:10 [PATCH] KVM: s390: introduce module parameter kvm.use_gisa Michael Mueller
2020-02-27  9:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-27 12:04   ` Michael Mueller
2020-02-27 12:31     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-27 12:57       ` Michael Mueller
2020-02-27  9:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-27 12:19   ` Michael Mueller
2020-02-27 12:27 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-27 12:43   ` Michael Mueller [this message]
2020-02-27 13:24     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-27 16:10       ` Michael Mueller
2020-02-27 12:48   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-27 12:56     ` Michael Mueller
2020-02-27 16:23 ` Christian Borntraeger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48bbf704-11c7-0f67-a5ca-ae2841faccde@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=mimu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox