From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Hildenbrand Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] KVM: kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev() should never fail Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:20:48 +0100 Message-ID: <48d409b3-d584-eaa3-24ca-e7330d6fc0e1@redhat.com> References: <20170323143441.5749-1-david@redhat.com> <20170323170635.1fb91a2c.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , rkrcmar@redhat.com, Dmitry Vyukov , Marcelo Tosatti , stable@vger.kernel.org, LKML To: Cornelia Huck Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170323170635.1fb91a2c.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org > As this may set kvm->buses[bus_idx] to NULL, don't you also need to > guard for bus == NULL in kvm_io_bus_destroy()? (I looked at the code on > kvm/queue.) very right, so something like this? diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c index e1be4b4..ef1aa7f 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c @@ -728,7 +728,8 @@ static void kvm_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm) spin_unlock(&kvm_lock); kvm_free_irq_routing(kvm); for (i = 0; i < KVM_NR_BUSES; i++) { - kvm_io_bus_destroy(kvm->buses[i]); + if (kvm->buses[i]) + kvm_io_bus_destroy(kvm->buses[i]); kvm->buses[i] = NULL; } kvm_coalesced_mmio_free(kvm); Thanks! > >> synchronize_srcu_expedited(&kvm->srcu); >> kfree(bus); >> - return r; >> + return; >> } > -- Thanks, David