From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [00/03][PATCH] kvm-ia64 updates for linux-2.6.28-rc2 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:45:10 +0200 Message-ID: <490876F6.7070009@redhat.com> References: <706158FABBBA044BAD4FE898A02E4BC2140C7FE4@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com> <490872D0.40006@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Zhang, Xiantao" , "kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" To: Jes Sorensen Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:34505 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750870AbYJ2OpQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:45:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jes Sorensen wrote: > Avi> Applied all, thanks. Is the third patch needed for 2.6.28? What > Avi> scenario does it fix? > > Please! > > The third patch reorganizes the data structures which saves us a ton > of space so we can go from 8 to 60 vcpus .... Would like it in as I > have stuff that I want to fix that goes on top of this. > > No, that's the first patch. And it was applied, but for 2.6.29, not 2.6.28. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function