From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kraxel@redhat.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws,
Sander.Vanleeuwen@sun.com, zach@vmware.com, brogers@novell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Activate Virtualization On Demand v3
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 13:49:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4911885B.3040703@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1225881664-16643-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de>
Alexander Graf wrote:
> X86 CPUs need to have some magic happening to enable the virtualization
> extensions on them. This magic can result in unpleasant results for
> users, like blocking other VMMs from working (vmx) or using invalid TLB
> entries (svm).
>
> Currently KVM activates virtualization when the respective kernel module
> is loaded. This blocks us from autoloading KVM modules without breaking
> other VMMs.
>
> To circumvent this problem at least a bit, this patch introduces on
> demand activation of virtualization. This means, that instead
> virtualization is enabled on creation of the first virtual machine
> and disabled on removal of the last one.
>
> So using this, KVM can be easily autoloaded, while keeping other
> hypervisors usable.
>
> v2 adds returns to non-x86 hardware_enables and adds IA64 change
> v3 changes:
> - use spin_lock instead of atomics
> - put locking to new functions hardware_{en,dis}able_all that get called
> on VM creation/destruction
> - remove usage counter checks where not necessary
> - return -EINVAL for IA64 slot < 0 case
>
>
Is this v3 with all the latest changes? it precedes some messages where
you say you'll change things by about 40 minutes.
In any case, I'll defer applying until Eduardo's kdump/reboot changes go
in, since they touch the same places, and Eduardo's changes are much
harder to test.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-05 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-05 10:41 [PATCH] Activate Virtualization On Demand v3 Alexander Graf
2008-11-05 11:49 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-11-05 11:55 ` Alexander Graf
2008-11-05 12:02 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-05 20:58 ` Eduardo Habkost
2008-11-06 12:57 ` Alexander Graf
2008-11-06 13:51 ` Eduardo Habkost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4911885B.3040703@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=Sander.Vanleeuwen@sun.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=brogers@novell.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox