From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH] Activate Virtualization On Demand v3 Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:02:23 +0200 Message-ID: <49118B4F.2000504@redhat.com> References: <1225881664-16643-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <4911885B.3040703@redhat.com> <491189A8.4040405@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kraxel@redhat.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws, Sander.Vanleeuwen@sun.com, zach@vmware.com, brogers@novell.com To: Alexander Graf Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:38794 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755464AbYKEMCm (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2008 07:02:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <491189A8.4040405@suse.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Alexander Graf wrote: >> In any case, I'll defer applying until Eduardo's kdump/reboot changes >> go in, since they touch the same places, and Eduardo's changes are >> much harder to test. >> > > I agree. > Apart from that, do I get an ACK for it, so I can at least put it into > our package and rest assured nothing obvious is wrong :-)? > It seems fine. (the part where you call on_each_cpu and have all functions write their reply into the same r is icky, but should work AFAICS) -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function