From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Farkas Levente Subject: can we hope a stable version in the near future? Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 22:13:01 +0100 Message-ID: <4917525D.709@lfarkas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: KVM Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]:60912 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755819AbYKIVNG (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:13:06 -0500 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so1987333fgg.17 for ; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 13:13:04 -0800 (PST) Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: hi, i've to repeat myself old mail again: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/18095 i see there is a lots of development in kvm lately. there are many people working on many thing, but most of them improvements and extensions. and those who read the list can see there are many basic problems too. rhel/centos-5 host can't boot mandrake-10 guest, fedora latest kernel guest, rhel/centos-5 x86-64 guest crash during boot, 100%cpu usage, rhes-4 can't boot etc. so imho it'd be useful to release a kvm version which fix all known bug and may be start a new branch for development asap. how long do you plan to keep kvm in a development stage without a stable release? i know it'll be a bit complicated to maintain 4 different tree (devel, stable x kernel, userspace), but it'd be very useful from the user's point of view. just my 2c:-( -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"