From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: can we hope a stable version in the near future? Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:29:49 +0200 Message-ID: <49180D1D.9000409@redhat.com> References: <4917525D.709@lfarkas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: KVM To: Farkas Levente Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:42108 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753936AbYKJK34 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2008 05:29:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4917525D.709@lfarkas.org> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Farkas Levente wrote: > hi, > i've to repeat myself old mail again: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/18095 > > i see there is a lots of development in kvm lately. there are many > people working on many thing, but most of them improvements and > extensions. and those who read the list can see there are many basic > problems too. rhel/centos-5 host can't boot mandrake-10 guest, fedora > latest kernel guest, rhel/centos-5 x86-64 guest crash during boot, > 100%cpu usage, rhes-4 can't boot etc. > so imho it'd be useful to release a kvm version which fix all known bug > and may be start a new branch for development asap. > how long do you plan to keep kvm in a development stage without a stable > release? > i know it'll be a bit complicated to maintain 4 different tree (devel, > stable x kernel, userspace), but it'd be very useful from the user's > point of view. > There is the maint/ series on git.kernel.org. It doesn't have formal releases though. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function