Re: can we hope a stable version in the near future?

[Farkas Levente <lfarkas@lfarkas.org>]

Martin Maurer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We integrated kvm-75 in our Proxmox VE 1.0 (http://pve.proxmox.com) as this was a quite stable release.
> We regularly test the most common Linux Distros and Windows (32 and 64 bit, including vista, 2008, windows7 (pre-beta)).

mandrake-10 can't boot on anything later then kvm-71:-(

> 76 and 77 got some issues with 64-bit windows, but they seemed fixed in 78. We got a fast growing user base (see http://www.proxmox.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=11). So if you go for Proxmox VE you have a good change you get a tested and quite reliable KVM platform now and in future. 

fedora's latest kernel can't boot on 77 and 78 and see my other notes.

> We did already migrations projects from VMware, XEN and others to Proxmox VE, including production MS Exchange 2003 servers with very good results.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Martin Maurer
> 
> martin@proxmox.com
> http://www.proxmox.com
> 
> ____________________________________________________________________
> Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH
> Kohlgasse 51/10, 1050 Vienna, Austria
> Phone: +43 1 545 4497 11 Fax: +43 1 545 4497 22
> Commercial register no.: FN 258879 f
> Registration office: Handelsgericht Wien
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org] On
>> Behalf Of Farkas Levente
>> Sent: Sonntag, 09. November 2008 22:13
>> To: KVM
>> Subject: can we hope a stable version in the near future?
>>
>> hi,
>> i've to repeat myself old mail again:
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/18095
>>
>> i see there is a lots of development in kvm lately. there are many
>> people working on many thing, but most of them improvements and
>> extensions. and those who read the list can see there are many basic
>> problems too. rhel/centos-5 host can't boot mandrake-10 guest, fedora
>> latest kernel guest, rhel/centos-5 x86-64 guest crash during boot,
>> 100%cpu usage, rhes-4 can't boot etc.
>> so imho it'd be useful to release a kvm version which fix all known bug
>> and may be start a new branch for development asap.
>> how long do you plan to keep kvm in a development stage without a stable
>> release?
>> i know it'll be a bit complicated to maintain 4 different tree (devel,
>> stable x kernel, userspace), but it'd be very useful from the user's
>> point of view.
>>
>> just my 2c:-(
>>
>> --
>>   Levente                               "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


-- 
  Levente                               "Si vis pacem para bellum!"