From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Farkas Levente Subject: Re: can we hope a stable version in the near future? Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:31:46 +0100 Message-ID: <49181BA2.50902@lfarkas.org> References: <4917525D.709@lfarkas.org> <7B7881568CF40E4388B615CD06F87B98057938@clara.maurer-it.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: KVM To: Martin Maurer Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:20560 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754416AbYKJLbw (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:31:52 -0500 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so2259607fgg.17 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:31:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7B7881568CF40E4388B615CD06F87B98057938@clara.maurer-it.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Martin Maurer wrote: > Hi, > > We integrated kvm-75 in our Proxmox VE 1.0 (http://pve.proxmox.com) as this was a quite stable release. > We regularly test the most common Linux Distros and Windows (32 and 64 bit, including vista, 2008, windows7 (pre-beta)). mandrake-10 can't boot on anything later then kvm-71:-( > 76 and 77 got some issues with 64-bit windows, but they seemed fixed in 78. We got a fast growing user base (see http://www.proxmox.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=11). So if you go for Proxmox VE you have a good change you get a tested and quite reliable KVM platform now and in future. fedora's latest kernel can't boot on 77 and 78 and see my other notes. > We did already migrations projects from VMware, XEN and others to Proxmox VE, including production MS Exchange 2003 servers with very good results. > > Best Regards, > > Martin Maurer > > martin@proxmox.com > http://www.proxmox.com > > ____________________________________________________________________ > Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH > Kohlgasse 51/10, 1050 Vienna, Austria > Phone: +43 1 545 4497 11 Fax: +43 1 545 4497 22 > Commercial register no.: FN 258879 f > Registration office: Handelsgericht Wien > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org] On >> Behalf Of Farkas Levente >> Sent: Sonntag, 09. November 2008 22:13 >> To: KVM >> Subject: can we hope a stable version in the near future? >> >> hi, >> i've to repeat myself old mail again: >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/18095 >> >> i see there is a lots of development in kvm lately. there are many >> people working on many thing, but most of them improvements and >> extensions. and those who read the list can see there are many basic >> problems too. rhel/centos-5 host can't boot mandrake-10 guest, fedora >> latest kernel guest, rhel/centos-5 x86-64 guest crash during boot, >> 100%cpu usage, rhes-4 can't boot etc. >> so imho it'd be useful to release a kvm version which fix all known bug >> and may be start a new branch for development asap. >> how long do you plan to keep kvm in a development stage without a stable >> release? >> i know it'll be a bit complicated to maintain 4 different tree (devel, >> stable x kernel, userspace), but it'd be very useful from the user's >> point of view. >> >> just my 2c:-( >> >> -- >> Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"