From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>, Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>,
Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] remove vcpu_info array v5
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:22:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <491851CD.9030401@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <491839CF.9060105@redhat.com>
Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> My patch gets rid of the pointless MAX_CPUS sized array, which doesn't
>> buy us anything. In fact, most of the changes in my patch makes the
>> code simpler, because it removes a stack of silly cases where qemu uses
>> env->cpu_index to get into the array, just to hide CPUState from libkvm,
>> just to have the callback in QEMU go from int vcpu back to CPUState.
>>
>> Lets just do it right and get rid of this silliness.
>
> I agree that vcpu_info should die. But we should still have a fast
> way of getting a cpu from a cpu_index. I don't see a problem with a
> static array of pointers, make it 16K in size if you want. Our real
> scaling limits are much lower; they involve the big qemu lock and the
> single iothread which will both limit scaling far below any static
> vcpu array.
Just do a linear search of the CPUState list and be done with it. This
smells of premature optimization greatly. I would be amazed if walking
the CPUState list is ever on the fast path or will ever be. Really, if
you need to go from cpu_index => CPUState, it suggests you're doing
something wrong.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-10 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-30 14:09 [patch] remove vcpu_info array v5 Jes Sorensen
2008-11-04 11:54 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-04 13:55 ` Glauber Costa
2008-11-04 14:30 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-04 14:35 ` Glauber Costa
2008-11-04 14:40 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-04 14:43 ` Glauber Costa
2008-11-04 14:47 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-10 13:30 ` Jes Sorensen
2008-11-10 13:40 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-10 15:22 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2008-11-10 15:45 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-10 15:47 ` Jes Sorensen
2008-11-10 15:54 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-10 15:58 ` Jes Sorensen
2008-11-11 9:26 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-12 13:02 ` Jes Sorensen
2008-11-12 13:09 ` Glauber Costa
2008-11-12 13:14 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-12 13:12 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-10 12:30 ` Jes Sorensen
2008-11-10 13:24 ` Jes Sorensen
2008-11-10 13:48 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-13 16:46 ` [patch] pass opague CPUState through libkvm instead of int vcpu Jes Sorensen
2008-11-18 12:55 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-18 12:59 ` Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=491851CD.9030401@us.ibm.com \
--to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=hollisb@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox