From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
Elsie Wahlig <elsie.wahlig@amd.com>,
"Serebrin,
Benjamin (Calendar)" <Benjamin.Serebrin@exchange.amd.com>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Cross vendor migration ideas
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:16:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <491BFE9B.6020101@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <746BBAD1-41EB-4966-8A88-B50314F75EC6@suse.de>
Alexander Graf wrote:
>> I wonder if patching is an option?
>
> Windows does have background daemons that check code in runtime and
> compares that to checksums. So binary patching might break Windows
> pretty easily. I'm really wondering why the CR8 patching still works -
> maybe even that'll break with Windows 7.
kvm doesn't patch Vista since the bios isn't mapped. Vista doesn't bang
heavily on the TPR like XP does so patching is not needed anyway.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-13 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-12 15:39 Cross vendor migration ideas Alexander Graf
2008-11-12 15:45 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-11-12 15:50 ` Alexander Graf
2008-11-12 15:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-11-13 0:02 ` Skywing
2008-11-13 1:48 ` Serebrin, Benjamin (Calendar)
2008-11-15 13:03 ` Andi Kleen
2008-11-15 16:39 ` Alexander Graf
2008-11-15 17:37 ` Andi Kleen
2008-11-16 15:36 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-17 11:09 ` Andi Kleen
2008-11-17 11:59 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-15 17:38 ` Glauber Costa
2008-11-16 14:58 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-13 10:16 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-11-12 20:06 ` Andi Kleen
2008-11-12 20:52 ` Alexander Graf
2008-11-13 10:20 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-12 16:52 ` Amit Shah
2008-11-12 17:19 ` Alexander Graf
2008-11-13 4:35 ` Amit Shah
2008-11-13 13:38 ` Alexander Graf
2008-11-14 13:07 ` Amit Shah
2008-11-14 23:43 ` Nitin A Kamble
2008-11-17 10:07 ` Amit Shah
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-16 0:23 Skywing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=491BFE9B.6020101@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=Benjamin.Serebrin@exchange.amd.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=elsie.wahlig@amd.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox