From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: Cross vendor migration ideas Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:20:58 +0200 Message-ID: <491BFF8A.8010800@redhat.com> References: <45680888-AF1B-42B6-B0A7-EE635F44E2A2@suse.de> <491AFA36.4040909@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Graf , "kvm@vger.kernel.org list" , Amit Shah , Elsie Wahlig , "Serebrin, Benjamin (Calendar)" , "Nakajima, Jun" To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:43309 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751437AbYKMKVJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Nov 2008 05:21:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <491AFA36.4040909@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Anthony Liguori wrote: > > I wonder if patching is an option? You would need to patch the syscall/sysenter and sysret/sysexit sites, as well as the kernel entry points, since the calling conventions are dissimilar. Finding a place to put the stubs would be difficult, at best. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function