From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: KVM performance Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:26:34 +0200 Message-ID: <49202D9A.8050408@redhat.com> References: <491DC50F.6080202@bayarea.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Randy Broman Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:46734 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751630AbYKPO0l (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Nov 2008 09:26:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <491DC50F.6080202@bayarea.net> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Randy Broman wrote: > > -I've tried both the default Cirrus adapter and the "-std-vga" option. > Which is better? Cirrus is generally better, but supports fewer resolutions. > I saw reference to another VMware-based adapter, but I can't figure > out how to implement > it - would that be better? > -vga vmware (with the new syntax needed by kvm-79); it should be better, but is less will tested. I'm not at all sure the Windows driver will like it. > -I notice we're up to kvm-79 vs my kvm-62. Should I move to the newer > version? Yes. > Do I > have to custom-compile my kernel to do so No. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function