From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: IA64: Using CFLAGS_vcpu.o to compile vcpu.c Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:50:20 +0200 Message-ID: <492540EC.9060805@redhat.com> References: <706158FABBBA044BAD4FE898A02E4BC219B28A98@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" To: "Zhang, Xiantao" Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:46948 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752995AbYKTKuN (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 05:50:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <706158FABBBA044BAD4FE898A02E4BC219B28A98@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Zhang, Xiantao wrote: > Hi, Avi > Please apply the patch and queue it as 2.6.28 fix. Thanks! > Xiantao > > From d759572033e1bf0e4ca6b7d8f7be8e8387fb4bbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Xiantao Zhang > Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:35:35 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] KVM: IA64: Using CFLAGS_vcpu.o to compile vcpu.c > > EXTRA_CFLAGS doesn't work for this case. > Can you provide more information on how this was only discovered now? Was there a change in mainline that removed support for EXTRA_CFLAGS? -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.