public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Xu, Jiajun" <jiajun.xu@intel.com>,
	"Yang, Sheng" <sheng.yang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Fix race between pending IRQ and NMI
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:04:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <492687BE.9030307@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49256D38.4090908@redhat.com>

Avi Kivity wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> The nmi handler could change the tpr to mask the preempted interrupt;
>>> but the code would not notice that.  Once the interrupt was injected the
>>> guest would see an interrupt at a higher priority than it has programmed
>>> the hardware to allow.
>>>     
>>
>> I consider this a bit far fetch. What sane NMI handler would fiddle with
>> the APIC? It would be fairly tricky to properly synchronize this with
>> the rest of the OS.
>>   
> 
> Sure, this is not a realistic guest.
> 
>>> Basically, once we commit to an interrupt via kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(),
>>> we must inject it before the any instruction gets executed.
>>>
>>> I don't think any real guest would notice, though.
>>>
>>>     
>>
>> Well, I have no problems with your approach (when also applied on the
>> user space irqchip path) of keeping the order *if* we can ensure that
>> only the first instruction of the IRQ handler is executed and we will
>> then inject the NMI. Otherwise this opens a prio inversion between IRQs
>> and NMIs. The point is that, unless I'm overseeing some detail right
>> now, your approach will inject the pending NMI only once the guest
>> /happens/ to exit the VM, right? If yes, then it's a no-go IMHO, also
>> for keeping this property with the queue approach.
>>   
> 
> enable_nmi_window() should cause an exit once the interrupt has been
> injected (likely before the first interrupt handler instruction was
> executed, but after the stack frame was created).  So the nmi will not
> be delayed.

Right now, you only call enable_nmi_window() if that window is currently
closed - and that's not the common case I'm worried about.

> 
> But I think I see a bigger issue - if we inject an regular interrupt
> while another is pending, then we will encounter this problem.  Looks
> like we have to enable the interrupt window after injecting an interrupt
> if there are still pending interrupts.

Yeah, probably. I'm just wondering now if we can set
exit-on-interrupt-window while the vcpu state is interruptible (ie.
_before_ the injection). There is some entry check like this for NMIs,
but maybe no for interrupts. Need to check.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 ES-OS
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-21 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-10 15:52 [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Fix race between pending IRQ and NMI Jan Kiszka
2008-11-16 12:29 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-16 14:58   ` Jan Kiszka
2008-11-16 15:15     ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-16 15:39       ` Jan Kiszka
2008-11-19 17:38         ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-19 21:28           ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-20 13:29             ` Jan Kiszka
2008-11-20 13:59               ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-21 10:04                 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2008-11-21 11:14                   ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-22 12:25                   ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-24  9:55                     ` Jan Kiszka
2008-11-25 14:45                       ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-25 14:55                         ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=492687BE.9030307@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=jiajun.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sheng.yang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox