From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Xu, Jiajun" <jiajun.xu@intel.com>,
"Yang, Sheng" <sheng.yang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Fix race between pending IRQ and NMI
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:04:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <492687BE.9030307@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49256D38.4090908@redhat.com>
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> The nmi handler could change the tpr to mask the preempted interrupt;
>>> but the code would not notice that. Once the interrupt was injected the
>>> guest would see an interrupt at a higher priority than it has programmed
>>> the hardware to allow.
>>>
>>
>> I consider this a bit far fetch. What sane NMI handler would fiddle with
>> the APIC? It would be fairly tricky to properly synchronize this with
>> the rest of the OS.
>>
>
> Sure, this is not a realistic guest.
>
>>> Basically, once we commit to an interrupt via kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(),
>>> we must inject it before the any instruction gets executed.
>>>
>>> I don't think any real guest would notice, though.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Well, I have no problems with your approach (when also applied on the
>> user space irqchip path) of keeping the order *if* we can ensure that
>> only the first instruction of the IRQ handler is executed and we will
>> then inject the NMI. Otherwise this opens a prio inversion between IRQs
>> and NMIs. The point is that, unless I'm overseeing some detail right
>> now, your approach will inject the pending NMI only once the guest
>> /happens/ to exit the VM, right? If yes, then it's a no-go IMHO, also
>> for keeping this property with the queue approach.
>>
>
> enable_nmi_window() should cause an exit once the interrupt has been
> injected (likely before the first interrupt handler instruction was
> executed, but after the stack frame was created). So the nmi will not
> be delayed.
Right now, you only call enable_nmi_window() if that window is currently
closed - and that's not the common case I'm worried about.
>
> But I think I see a bigger issue - if we inject an regular interrupt
> while another is pending, then we will encounter this problem. Looks
> like we have to enable the interrupt window after injecting an interrupt
> if there are still pending interrupts.
Yeah, probably. I'm just wondering now if we can set
exit-on-interrupt-window while the vcpu state is interruptible (ie.
_before_ the injection). There is some entry check like this for NMIs,
but maybe no for interrupts. Need to check.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 ES-OS
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-21 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-10 15:52 [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Fix race between pending IRQ and NMI Jan Kiszka
2008-11-16 12:29 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-16 14:58 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-11-16 15:15 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-16 15:39 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-11-19 17:38 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-19 21:28 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-20 13:29 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-11-20 13:59 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-21 10:04 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2008-11-21 11:14 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-22 12:25 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-24 9:55 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-11-25 14:45 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-25 14:55 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=492687BE.9030307@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=jiajun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sheng.yang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox