From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000 VLAN offload emulation
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:25:36 -0600
Message-ID: <4926E100.8040908@codemonkey.ws>
References: <1227127052.7652.20.camel@lappy>	 <4925EEA7.6000804@codemonkey.ws> <1227282085.7652.37.camel@lappy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.24]:29455 "EHLO
	ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1756626AbYKUQZn (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:25:43 -0500
Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 6so418394eyi.37
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:25:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1227282085.7652.37.camel@lappy>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 17:11 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>   
>> The patch looks good but I don't like the idea of taking patches against 
>> kvm-userspace.  It suggests that people have only tested in 
>> kvm-userspace which means it's not guaranteed to work (or even compile) 
>> in upstream QEMU.  Please rebase against QEMU and resubmit.
>>     
>
> Hi Anthony,
>
> Thanks for reviewing.  Here's a new one, created and tested against qemu
> 5765.  Thanks,
>   

Applied.  Thanks.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori