public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org, anthony@codemonkey.ws
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] Accelerate nested SVM by emulating parts of GIF=0 v6
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:53:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4926E771.9000704@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1227280482-25361-13-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de>

Alexander Graf wrote:
> Until this patch we bounced between the VM and the VMM for a couple of
> instructions after CLGI, only to find out that yet another SVM instruction
> follows.
> Since roundtrips are really expensive, it's a lot faster to emulate these
> few instructions. Now we can execute CLGI/VMLOAD/VMRUN on one intercept and
> VMEXIT/VMSAVE on another. This is a major speed improvement!
>
>
>   

Neat trick.  Have you looked at svm.c to see if we can cut out 
extraneous instructions (or move them out of the gif=0 area)?  Could 
mean big savings.

> +static int nested_svm_emulate(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
> +{
> +	int er;
> +	u32 opcode = 0;
> +	unsigned long rip;
> +	unsigned long rip_linear;
> +
> +	svm->vmcb->save.rax = svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX];
> +	svm->vmcb->save.rsp = svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP];
> +	svm->vmcb->save.rip = svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RIP];
> +	rip = svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RIP];
> +	rip_linear = rip + svm_seg(&svm->vcpu, VCPU_SREG_CS)->base;
> +
> +	er = emulator_read_std(rip_linear, (void *)&opcode, 3, &svm->vcpu);
> +	if (er != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
> +		return er;
> +	er = EMULATE_FAIL;
> +
> +	switch (opcode) {
> +		case 0xda010f:
> +			vmload_interception(svm, kvm_run);
> +			er = EMULATE_DONE;
> +			break;
> +		case 0xd8010f:
> +			vmrun_interception(svm, kvm_run);
> +			er = EMULATE_DONE;
> +			break;
> +		case 0xdb010f:
> +			vmsave_interception(svm, kvm_run);
> +			er = EMULATE_DONE;
> +			break;
> +		case 0xdc010f:
> +			stgi_interception(svm, kvm_run);
> +			er = EMULATE_DONE;
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			nsvm_printk("NSVM: Opcode %x unknown\n", opcode);
> +	}
> +
> +	nsvm_printk("NSVM: svm emul at 0x%lx -> %d\n", rip, er);
> +
> +	return er;
> +}
> +
>   

Move to the regular x86 emulator, so if we extend it with debug flag 
support, privilege checking, etc, we get that for svm as well.

>  static int nested_svm_vmexit_real(struct vcpu_svm *svm, void *arg1,
>  				  void *arg2, void *opaque)
>  {
> @@ -1551,6 +1600,9 @@ static int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>  	kvm_mmu_reset_context(&svm->vcpu);
>  	kvm_mmu_load(&svm->vcpu);
>  
> +	/* KVM calls vmsave after vmrun, so let's run it now if we can */
> +	nested_svm_emulate(svm, NULL);
> +
>   

Will also call stgi eventually, so it may make sense to loop here too.


-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-21 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-21 15:14 [PATCH 00/12] Add support for nested SVM (kernel) v6 Alexander Graf
2008-11-21 15:14 ` [PATCH 01/12] Clean up VINTR setting v6 Alexander Graf
2008-11-21 15:14   ` [PATCH 02/12] Move EFER and MSR constants to generic x86 code v6 Alexander Graf
2008-11-21 15:14     ` [PATCH 03/12] Add helper functions for nested SVM v6 Alexander Graf
2008-11-21 15:14       ` [PATCH 04/12] Implement GIF, clgi and stgi v6 Alexander Graf
2008-11-21 15:14         ` [PATCH 05/12] Implement hsave v6 Alexander Graf
2008-11-21 15:14           ` [PATCH 06/12] Add VMLOAD and VMSAVE handlers v6 Alexander Graf
2008-11-21 15:14             ` [PATCH 07/12] Add VMRUN handler v6 Alexander Graf
2008-11-21 15:14               ` [PATCH 08/12] Add VMEXIT handler and intercepts v6 Alexander Graf
2008-11-21 15:14                 ` [PATCH 09/12] Allow read access to MSR_VM_VR v6 Alexander Graf
2008-11-21 15:14                   ` [PATCH 10/12] Allow setting the SVME bit v6 Alexander Graf
2008-11-21 15:14                     ` [PATCH 11/12] Only allow setting of EFER_SVME when CPUID SVM is set v6 Alexander Graf
2008-11-21 15:14                       ` [PATCH 12/12] Accelerate nested SVM by emulating parts of GIF=0 v6 Alexander Graf
2008-11-21 16:53                         ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-11-21 16:58                           ` Alexander Graf
2008-11-21 17:07                             ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-21 17:14                               ` Alexander Graf
2008-11-21 17:18                                 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-21 17:35                                   ` Alexander Graf
2008-11-21 15:23               ` [PATCH 07/12] Add VMRUN handler v6 Muli Ben-Yehuda
2008-11-21 15:26                 ` Alexander Graf
2008-11-21 15:35                   ` Alexander Graf
2008-11-23  8:06                     ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2008-11-23 13:48                       ` Alexander Graf
2008-11-23 15:09                         ` Muli Ben-Yehuda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4926E771.9000704@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox